The world weighs in on Powell's performance at the UN: did he make a convincing case? American papers say yes (mostly); other papers lean towards no.
The Independent has a lead article entitled "An impressive show; but Mr Powell failed to make the case for a war on Iraq".
Pravda takes a short but clearly skeptical view.
The Guardian sits on the fence, the author not convinced that we should go to war but not convinced that we shouldn't, either.
The New York Times says that Powell may not have produced the smoking gun "but ... left little question that Mr. Hussein had tried hard to conceal one."
Slate states baldly that Powell Delivered the Goods on Saddam.
The London Daily Telegraph sides with the American administration and chides the Europeans for not offering any viable alternative.
The Washington Post calls the evidence Irrefutable.
The Globe and Mail feels that Powell presented a strong case.
Arab News states that "most commentators who saw the speech remained unconvinced that there was need for a war against Iraq: and quotes Norman Solomon, co-author of the the book "Target Iraq" in support of that view.